Rakofsky v. The Internet

Friday, February 8, 2013

Citizen Media Law Project is PART of the LYNCH Mob that really is Internet Mobbing their Targets, Alleges Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox. Citizen Media Law Project has a Real Boner for Randazza Legal Group, and Innocent TARGETS aKa Defendants Pay the Price. Citizen Media Law Project claims Rakofsky v. The Internet is a SLAPP, yet Totally IGNORE the Real SLAPP District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

Come on Josephy Rakofsky in Rakofsky v. The Internet is a SLAPP, a Legal Threat to the Citizen Media Law Project Staff writing these "Legal Commentaries", yet the Citizen Media Law Project IGNORES the Real SLAPP District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, the Real "Legal Threat", the REAL Free Speech Threat, Abuse of Power, Violation of Freedom of Expression, and Complete Violation of Due process and constitutional rights of Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and iViewit Founder, Inventor Eliot Bernstein? Why? To Protect WHO? Gee Duh, that is NOT to hard to figure out.

Citizen Media Law Project Staff is JADED, and they Paint a False Picture, in FAVOR of Randazza Legal Group, EVERY TIME.

Seriously, don't you Think that the readers of the Citizen Media Law Site, would be interested in how an intellectual property law firm can have massive Domains Names Taken, Blogs Deleted, and huge FINES, just because some Trademark Attorney sought vengeance? And on top of that make you pay their LEGAL fees to do it ???

Or how about the Case of a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement against a Blogger, ME, and their Buddy at Randazza Legal Group, SEEMING to conspire with, Advise, an Oregon Attorney, David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp, the Opposing Counsel in Obsidian V. Cox, in order to SEIZE a Defendant's Right to Appeal as an Asset to satisfy a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement?

Is this not a MASSIVE Issue that the PUBLIC should Know About?

I, Crystal Cox have personally communicated with the Citizen Media Law Project Staff on this massively important issue and have been ignored. I even sent them the Motion to Stay and the Memorandum, filed by Constitutional Rights Attorney, UCLA Professor Eugene Volokh, that ALL should have, as a research tool for, if this happens to them, yet the Citizen Media Law Project Staff refuses to discuss it, why? Because they are connected to the Internet Mobbing Gang and they are PROTECTING the "False Light".

For Those Who Want to KNOW about how YOUR Rights to an APPEAL can be STOLEN, Sold at a Sheriff Sale by Unethical ATTORNEY... and ALL should want to KNOW, here is more information on the Attempt to Steal My Appeal Rights and the Court Documents Involved.

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/david-s-aman-tonkon-torp-lawyer.html

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/eugene-volokh-ucla-professor-and.html

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/january-2013-obsidian-finance-group-llc.html

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2013/01/motion-to-stay-to-stop-david-aman.html

Citizen Media Law Project is PART of the LYNCH Mob that really is Internet Mobbing their Targets, Alleges Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox. Citizen Media Law Project has a Real Boner for Randazza Legal Group, and Innocent TARGETS aKa Defendants Pay the Price. Citizen Media Law Project claims Rakofsky v. The Internet is a SLAPP, yet Totally IGNORE the Real SLAPP District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

Is this not a MASSIVE Issue that the PUBLIC should Know About?

Citizen Media Law Project is PART of the LYNCH Mob that really is Internet Mobbing their Targets, Alleges Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox. Citizen Media Law Project has a Real Boner for Randazza Legal Group, and Innocent TARGETS aKa Defendants Pay the Price. Citizen Media Law Project claims Rakofsky v. The Internet is a SLAPP, yet Totally IGNORE the Real SLAPP District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

Is this not a MASSIVE Issue that the PUBLIC should Know About?

Matthew H. Goldsmith and Joseph Rakofsky Should not Be Sanctioned. Eric Turkewitz, Randazza Legal Group and Alleged Co-Conspirators SHOULD Be Sanctioned and INDICTED for their Massive Fraud on the Courts Says Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.

"1/2/2013 - After a six month period in which plaintiffs did not withdraw their claims as urged by the court at the June 28, 2012 hearing, the defendants represented by the Turkewitz Law Firm and Randazza Legal Group file a motion for sanctions against plaintiffs and attorney Goldsmith for vexatious conduct and frivolous claims."

Source of Quote
http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/rakofsky-v-internet#description

Joseph Rakofsky in the Case, Rakofsky v. The Internet, is not making "Frivolous Claims". He is being Lynched, Set Up, Extorted in a Way, Defamed, Painted in False Light, Harassed, Intimidated, Lied About, Threatened, Mistreated and more.. and these Same Defendants in Rakofsky v. The Internet, many of them are Counter Defendants in a Real "SLAPP" Case known as District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

There seems to be a Pattern and History with these Journalists, Attorneys, Lawyer Bloggers, Law Firms, and they SHOULD not have Free Reign to Gang Up and Ruin Lives, nor to use their power and privilege to Defame, seemingly legally, and to ruin lives based on lies.

Joseph Rakofsky in the Case, Rakofsky v. The Internet, had the backbone to stand up to them all, and they, in turn, GANG UP, some more, to convince judges, courts, other law firms, and the public at large, via their mirage known as "Legal Commentary" of the "Legal Blogsphere", that Joseph Rakofsky is being "frivolous" and that Joseph Rakofsky and Attorney Matthew H. Goldsmith SHOULD be Sanctioned. Why? Because they Stood up to a LYNCH MOB.

Pattern and History among, what Looks to be Common Co-Conspirators, Bloggers, Attorneys, Media Outlets in the Case, Rakofsky v. The Internet of Joseph Rakofsky and the Crystal L. Cox Cases of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and District of Oregon CIVIL CASE 3:11-cv-00057-HZ, SHOULD not be taken lightly by Special Investigators. As this "Gang" is POWERFUL in the Media and the Courts, and Joseph Rakofsky is FLAT out TELLING the TRUTH.

These same Defendants in Rakofsky v. The Internet, and many of them are Counter Defendants in a Real "SLAPP" Case known as District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL have also attacked insiders, investigative bloggers, whistle blowers in the Porn Industry Exposing them. The Pattern and History is there. Look at their attack on Shelley Lubben, Monica Foster aKa Alexandria Melody and Diana Grandmason aKa Desi Foxx. They have done this with the First Amendment Coalition, the Free Speech Legal Defense Fund (FSLDF), in effort to SILENCE blogs, online media, investigative bloggers, insiders, whistle blower REPORTING on them.

In District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL they even named Monica Foster aKa Alexandria Melody and Diana Grandmason aKa Desi Foxx SIMPLY to defame, threaten and harass them when they WERE unrelated to me, investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. They are "related" now, as we are part of a number of individuals ATTACKED by this Internet Mobbing, Gang Stalking Group.

They need to be EXPOSED, Stopped. Instead, for Now, they have Free Reign of the Courts and they Punish whoever they want, in WHATEVER way they want, and have NO Accountability.

Also Check Out These Blogs for More Information

http://www.aribass.com/

http://www.josephrakofsky.com/

http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.com/

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/

http://rakofskyvtheinternet.blogspot.com/

http://ranaankatz.blogspot.com/

This Gang, Gets my Videos, Blogs, Documents Removed Often, and YET pretend to be Supporters of the First Amendment, which clearly they are Hypocritical on.. so if anything is Missing from My Blogs and you want it, email me at one or all of these eMails, as they block those too, SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com OR ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com or at Crystal@CrystalCox.com - the LEGAL Blogsphere Gate Keepers, get my blogs removed ALL the TIME, so who knows that will be here or there when you find this blog post.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Mulvihill and Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog INTERNET Mobbing, Organized Crime, Alleged Criminal and Civil Conspiracy / RICO Alleged by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. This Internet Mobbing Gang, with alleged members such as Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, they take one email out of many, they take a facebook post, a judges words out of context or old archived comments and posts they intentionally, maliciously paint a picture in the "legal blogsphere" to RUIN the lives of their targets and get their INTENDED RESULTS. They do this to win court cases, and to wipe out competition, oh and to Remove internet sites Exposing THEM. In my Opinion, and according to my Research and Personal Experience, They are GUILTY of Defamation, Harassment, Criminal Endangerment, Intentional Infliction, RICO Crimes and More. Yet they are a gang of attorneys and they have BIG Media Backing, and huge money such as Jordan Rushie Client Liberty Media Holdings. And therefore They are Above the LAW and will NOT be Found Guilty. YOU LOSE !!

This post in it's Entirety, as with this Entire Blog, is written upon the belief, knowledge, and interpretation of Knowledge of Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.

Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is one of many gang stalking, internet mobbing attorneys, bloggers, who work with the Legal Satyricon, and other Internet Mobbing ALLEGED Co-Conspirators to "shakedown" clients, Defendants, and even their own Plaintiffs (clients), in order to win court cases, remove online competition and Retaliate against Whistle Blowers / Insiders, exposing them.

Supreme Court of the State of New York; County of New York, Case Number 105573-2011 (Rakofsky v. The Internet) is one such case, and so is District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog attacks his victims without paying any attention to KNOWN Facts. This is against the LAW and it is NOT protected by the First Amendment, see these gang stalking, internet mobbing attorneys, bloggers, knowingly post FALSE information, with actual malice, to deliberately commit fraud on the courts and create a false version of reality.

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, Says

"The legal blogosphere did some more investigating and found it got worse."

Source of

http://phillylawblog.wordpress.com/2013/01/06/joseph-rakofsky-and-matthew-h-goldsmith-when-keeping-it-real-goes-wrong/

Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog IS a Spineless Coward and is Full of SHIT.

These EVIL Gang Stalkers love to PRETEND they are ALL for the Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Expression, and the First Amendment Rights of ALL. Thing is they are Certainly Not, when those rights ALLOW bloggers, such as me, to expose their alleged ILLEGAL, immoral, unethical activity.

Side Note: You BOYS Fucked with the WRONG Bitch. I will Fight to the Death. And your constant threats of bye bye, attacks, ruining my life, suppressing me, stealing from me and making me a pauper, well OH WELL. I Fear No Evil and If I Die for THIS, So Be It. At least I will NOT Die a Coward, and the TRUTH will LIVE ON.

So about this torrid, FAKE, love affair these gang stalking, internet mobbing attorneys, bloggers have with the First Amendment: See they LOVE Times vs. Sullivan, GIVES them a Real Boner they CALL a "shimmery force field of First Amendment protection", they have even PULLED it out of their ASSES in their SLAPP suit against me, District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, as a DEFENSE to my accusing them of DEFAMING ME.

Thing is, Times V. Sullivan seems pretty clear to me that if you KNOWINGLY post False Allegations, with actual malice, then you OWE me a BUNCH of MONEY. You cannot KNOWINGLY post I am guilty of extortion (False Information) when you KNOW (Actual Malice) that I did not commit Extortion, and deliberately, knowingly cause me intentional harm and broadcast this as fact, thereby causing me deliberate, irreparable harm? Then claim a Cloak of Armor in Times Vs. Sullivan, that's PURE hypocritical HOGWASH.

And boy do they know I am not guilty of Extortion, see I emailed the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff, and he claims it to be extortion, oh, or implied extortion you see.. and, well the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff was my attorney for a brief few days, attempting to STOP my Ninth Circuit Appeal of Obsidian V. Cox, and the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff, knew I did not extort anyone.

He had all the emails, all the facts and he knew that there was no investigation, no guilt, yet in a whistle blower retaliation, criminal endangerment, paint in false light, WITH actual malice hate campaign, hate crime, the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff broadcast EVERYWHERE that I was GUILTY of Extortion. the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff had Actual Malice and therefore cannot hide behind the Skirt tails of Times v. Sullivan, though YES I now am a "Public Figure" and all.

The other ALLEGED Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL knew also, as the information was easily found, one of them Tracey Coenen of Sequenceinc.com - the Fraud Files, even posted on her blog, my comments that I was not under investigation nor convicted of Extortion, but she went ahead and accused me of it anyway. She claims to be a Fraud Investigation EXPERT, yet did not investigate the facts? Or did she and post knowingly? Well she admits on her blog to knowing I say I was not under investigation of Extortion nor convicted of Extortion, so she sure SEEMS to me to be guilty of Defamation, with actual malice. This is just one example of this Internet Mobbing Gang set to ruin lives without facts, but with plenty of ACTUAL MALICE. The worst being Kashmir Hill of Forbes, Portland Oregon Tonkon Torp Attorney David S. Aman, Peter L. Michaelson WIPO Panelist and David Carr of the New York Times.

So you See TIMES vs. Sullivan would not work in a Non-Corrupt Court.

Luckily, for the Bad Guys, there is NOT one in Site of this Case.

Times v. Sullivan Says, "Held: A State cannot, under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, award damages to a public official for defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves "actual malice"--that the statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard of whether it was true or false. Pp. 265-292."

http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/nytvsullivan.html

See, the Alleged Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and the Puppeteer aKa Plaintiff, YES, did Speak on a "Public Official" interchangeable with "Public Figure", ME, however, I CAN prove they had actual malice, they new, many were insiders in my case and new there were more emails and proof of NO Extortion, new that EXTORTION was not a factor relating to my cases.

Yet they used EXTORTION as a Weapon, as a Reason to RUIN me, Defame me, Lynch Me, put me in danger, steal my intellectual property, deny my rights, and irreparably damage me, and EXTORTION was NOT a factor in my case, nor was I under investigation for EXTORTION, and they all knew this. THEY had Actual Malice, which is Easily Proven to a Neutral, non-Corrupt Court, should one turn up, or even exist.

No worries of them getting an actual judgement for Defaming me, threatening me, stalking me, intimidating me, SEE they are ABOVE the Law and Control the Courts. I don't post this as a woe is me, I want to WIN, I already LOST. I post this to EXPOSE their Big Dumb Asses, and Show you how their SCHEME works, to help you avoid their TIRADE. And to help you to FIGHT BACK.

And when they RULE unethically and conflicted in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, I will be filing criminal complaints as I fully believe they are all acting in conspiracy, and I will be filing a Ninth Circuit Appeal, in order to expose them ALL further, I do this for the Greater Good.

In the Obsidian V. Cox case, my case, they ganged up on me to flat out state over and over that I was guilty of Extortion. Yet I was not even on trial for, nor under investigation for extortion. They then, posted all manner of lies about me and my sources in order to silence me, intimidate me. They even emailed my and gave, not so subtle threats to try and stop me from my Ninth Circuit Appeal as they did not want my precedence to affect their REALITY.

Obsidian V. Cox will change the GAME for ALL Citizen Bloggers, Whistle Blowers, and will level the playing field between traditional journalists and investigative bloggers.

Obsidian V. Cox already creates amazing legal briefs in support to BIG Media having NO Monopoly on Free Speech ANYMORE. Read the Documents of the Appeal, and if you need to know if I am a "scammer", "extortionist" or whatever, in order to believe that bloggers and journalists should have equal protection under the law and the constitution of the United States, then read ALL documented facts of my case to FULLY understand the TRUTH..

If you really care about the original case I was exposing in Obsidian V. Cox, check out

http://www.obsidianfinancesucks.com/

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/

http://www.objectiontofees.com/

http://kevinpadrickobsidianfinance.blogspot.com/

Or just listen to the "Opinion" of your Favorite "Legal Commentary" BLOGGER of the "Legal Blogsphere" and don't think for yourself or read the actual facts.

Remember Folks, as you read all those "Legal Commentary" Crystal L. Cox Haters, and listen to the "legal blogsphere", first of all think for yourself and secondly remember in the Obsidian V. Cox NINTH Circuit Appeal which is the most important case of our times for Citizen Journalists, Investigative Bloggers, Whistle Blowers and New Media Free Press, that as they TRASH talk me, remember that in an APPEAL, no NEW evidence or argument can come in, and as they spew HATE on how I messed up my Case going Pro SE, realize that the APPEAL is my Case, the Attorney has to use the defense I, myself, preserved in the Lower Court, they cannot enter in new information or evidence. So yes my Attorney, is the Worlds BEST Constitutional Rights Attorney, and he is the ONLY Real, Ethical Constitutional Rights Hero out there, and yes he has presented this case in an ACTUAL Legal Commentary way that will go down in history, however, NOTE that I preserved this defense in my representation of myself. So look DEEPER Then the FAKE, Illusion of "Legal Commentary" of the "Legal Blogsphere" controlled by the ALLEGED Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

See most believe, and even hang on every word of this GANG, that acts as if they are just attorneys from all over the country creating "Legal Commentary" in the "legal blogsphere" , when the Truth is, they are conspiring, in order to affect certain outcomes to very high DOLLAR legal cases.

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, Breaking Media LLC (AbovetheLaw.com ), Eric Turkewitz of theTurkewitz Law Firm, J. Malcom DeVoy and the Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group, Mark Bennett of Bennett and Bennett Law Firm and the blog blog.BennettandBennett.com, Scott H. Greenfield of blog.SimpleJustice.us,, Thomas Reuters,NPR Bob Garfield, David Carr of the New York Times, Kashmir Hill of Forbes, Tracy L. Coenen of the Fraud Files Sequenceinc.com, NewyorkPersonalInjuryAttorneyBlog.com, SiouxsieLaw.com, SaltyDroid.info Jason Jones, Christopher L. Jorgensen and more alleged co-conspirators NEED to be EXPOSED.

To this day, they continue to use their power and knowledge of the "legal blogosphere" to create FALSE, misleading, illusionary "Legal Commentary" to turn into the courts as evidence and to use against their clients, former clients and in retaliation of whistle blowers exposing their dangers, lucrative scheme.

This Internet Mobbing / Gang Stalking Group take one email out of many, they take a facebook post, or old archived comments and then they paint a picture of their victims such as Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and Joseph Rakofsky that is intentionally false. They do this to win court cases, retaliate against whistle blowers and control people they don't like or who compete with them in the search engines.

In my Opinion, and according to my Research and Personal Experience, They are GUILTY of Defamation, Harassment, Criminal Endangerment,Intentional Infliction, RICO Crimes and More. Yet they are a gang of attorneys and they have BIG Media Backing, and huge money such as Jordan Rushie Client Liberty Media Holdings. And therefore They are Above the LAW.

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, Says "The legal blogosphere did some more investigating and found it got worse."

Source of

http://phillylawblog.wordpress.com/2013/01/06/joseph-rakofsky-and-matthew-h-goldsmith-when-keeping-it-real-goes-wrong/

"legal blogosphere" meaning CONTROLLED Opposition in a way, meaning their version of reality they want the COURTS and the VICTIMS to believe so they get paid larger settlements, and Faster negotiations. Nothing works better for their Settlement Negotiations then for them to harass, intimidate, SLAPP, over bill, pressure, and paint their clients in false light. Especially if it's a, HEY its NOT ME, see its the "Legal Commentary" of the "legal blogosphere". They said it so it must be true, see Judge, here is my PROOF.. NOT !!!

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, and alleged co-conspirators, control the "legal blogosphere". Another words they ensure that the public at large, those involved in their legal cases, and the judges in those cases, view the details, facts of the matter in small, out of context pieces that benefit their version of reality, to WIN THEIR CASES, underFalse Evidence Appearing Real.

See this "legal blogosphere" attorney lynch mob and their big media and big money connections painting their target in false light intentionally and with actual malice, is "Legal Commentary" according to Judge Gloria M. Navarro in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, and was used to STEAL my life's work, harass me, defame me, intimidate me, paint me in false light, strip me of my First Amendment Rights, Freedom of Expression Rights, Due Process Rights, and Free Speech Rights. All because of False, ALLEGED, "Legal Commentary" from the FAKE, Controlled, Illusion of the "legal blogosphere".

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is "Captain Obvious", and Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, claimed to do some "investigating" in my case as well. However really Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, "Captain Obvious" posted a Crazy Crystal Cox video and flat out lied about Defendant / Counter Plaintiff Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, posted false statements, targeted a mother of 3, my CPA whisteblower in a 40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy, and continues to use this same KNOWINGLY false information to Defame me, Harass me, Intimidate me.

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is is EVIL, and his action, SAYS Defendant / Counter Plaintiff Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, are Criminal, are Racketeering, RICO, and flat out Against the LAW.

And meanwhile Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is "Captain Obvious", is alleged to be guilty of a Hate Crime in Doing So, as well as Criminal Endangerment in in RICO Violations as it seems that Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog is "Captain Obvious" did the same thing to Joseph Rakofsky.

PHILLY says "Why would the judge say such mean things about Rakofsky on the record? According to Rakofsky:" What a bunch of BULLSHIT, says Blogger Crystal Cox.

Mulvihill & Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog wants you to think, in your fantasy land of the mind, that JUDGES don't lie, judges are not corrupt or conflicted and that no way would a judge IMPLY or flat out say something MEAN, and UNTRUE? Well Yep, it happened in the Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox New Trial Motion DENIAL and it happened in the Joseph Rakofsky case, and I am sure countless others.

This gang stalking Internet Mobbing attorney lynch mob are a powerful group of attorneys. See they get the "Internet", whereby most attorneys and Judges do not. So they simply BLOG the outcome they want in a case, in each others case, in conspiracy to GET them Paid Quicker and to Remove their Competition. Such as in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL., oftentimes they file a legal case, as they have instant access the Electronic Filing Court Docket, and they they use this gang stalking Internet Mobbing attorney lynch mob to paint a picture of their side of the case, BEFORE they even attempt to SERVE their Victims aKa Defendants.

This gang stalking Internet Mobbing attorney lynch mob's behavior is dangerous to their targets. And if you don't understand the "internet", SEO, and the power of the search engines, then you would simply believe this gang of Internet Mobbing attorneys was giving you facts on legal cases, thing is they are no were near neutral on these cases. They are financially involved, connected to each other and they do this over and over as the record shows.

This gang of Internet Mobbing attorneys cannot be stopped, as they are Above the Law, they Control the Courts and they have massive Porn Industry Money behind them disguised as the "First Amendment Protection". And they have insiders at Godaddy, Google, Wordpress, Forbes, Fox News and more big media connections. Add to this Liberty Media Holdings, whom own a massive amount of media companies and Ronald D. Green, his Alleged Mafia Ties Boss, and Jordan Rushie have Liberty Media Holdings as a client.

These THUGS are untouchable, they OWN the courts, and whatever domain name, blog, website they want, they will simply take it. Whatever perception they want taken / given / perceived in a lawsuit, they will create the "Legal Commentary" to back it up, on their mirage, fake, paint in false light, IT'S a Set UP "legal blogsphere" blogs. Then they print out these "legal blogsphere" / "Legal Commentary" and enter them onto the court docket for a JUDGE, often times, I believe in conspiracy with them, to take these blog printouts as actual documented facts and use them to STEAL massive domain names, wipe out large amounts of online content that exposes them, and gives them and INSTANT massive, unfair advantage in the search engines. See I got to the top of the search engines with dozens of domain names and blogs, and they simply wiped them OUT. No due process, no first amendment adjudication, NO Rights what so ever.

They even use their WINS, their Easily Gotten Preliminary INJUNCTIONS as Instant Precedence for their clients to take other victims blogs and domain names, such as Manwin Vs. Bulgin. Where SUDDENLY the Sucks sites are Trademark Violations when these same attorneys, companies once fought the opposite defense.

This gang of Internet Mobbing attorneys twist the facts, lie to judges, pull archaic laws out their asses to win cases, then take the exact opposite stance to win others, such as the massively hypocritical Ranaan Katz case, let's see are we FOR or against adjudication of the first amendment, I can't remember?

Let's see are we FOR or against preliminary injunctions, I can't remember? I am a Fucktard Attorney who abuses my power, and commits constant fraud on the courts.. check this one out..

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/oh-hypocrisy-of-district-of-nevada-case.html

Yet these same Evil Assholes, TOOK my BLOGS, Domain Names, Intellectual property BEFORE and without any adjudication of the first amendment.

My VALID Objections, IGNORED by a Judge who refuses to Admit or Deny Conflicts

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142333607/Opposition-to-Document-28---Google-Drive

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142405052/REPLY-IN-SUPPORT-OF-PLAINTIFFS-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction-Against-Cox-and-Bernstein

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142332681/Defendant-Crystal-Cox-Objection-to-TRO-Injunctive-Relief

Judge Refuses to Admit Conflict or to Remove herself from My Case. THIS is MY LIFE, I have Rights, and these Assholes just strip me of them for their own personal gain.

""ORDER Granting Docket Document 2

Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Motion Hearing set for 1/7/2013 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7D before Judge Gloria M. Navarro re 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 12/28/2012. Replies due by 1/4/2013. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) (Entered:12/17/2012), Document Entry 14

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142332117/Exhibit-TRO-A-Letter-From-Ron-Green-Ltr-to-Cox-encl-TRO-Order"

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142313093/District-of-Nevada-Case-Number-212-cv-02040-GMN-PA-Conflict-of-Interest-Disclosure-Request-January-12th-2013

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142312908/District-of-Nevada-Case-Number-212-cv-02040-GMN-PAL-MOTION-for-Recusal-of-District-Judge-Gloria-Navarro-filed-by-Counter-Claimant-Crystal-L-Cox-Counter-Plaintiff-Crystal-L-Cox-Defendant-Cox

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/142310771/Pro-Se-Defendant---Pro-Se-Counter-Defendant-Crystal-Cox-Reply-to-Plaintiffs-Response-in-Opposition-to-Motion-Requesting-Reclusal-Removal-Disqualification-of-Judge-Gloria-Navvaro

Let's see are we Fucktard Attorneys FOR or against those "Sucks" Sites those Gripe sites, those Parody or Satire Sites, those sites that BITCH about others on the Internet??? Gee, I am a FUCKTARD Plaintiff Puppeteer and I just I can't remember?

Note who the Hypocritical Fucktard, Puppet Master Attorney Defending this Domain Name is:

GlenBeckRapedANDMurderedAyoungGirlin1990.com

Side Note: this guy does NOT defend "Sucks" sites and Parody Sites Anymore. He has recovered from all that First Amendment Nonesense.

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/you-know-who-else-thinks-that-murder-is.html

Yet this same Puppet Master took my Parody Sites, Satire Sites, Suck Sites.

WOW, must be Nice to OWN THE COURTS.

Let's see are we Fucktard Attorneys FOR or against those those SLAPP Lawsuits, I just can't remember? Check out the Link Below to JOG your Hypocritical Memory.

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/01/hey-remember-article-called-oregon-no.html

This gang of Internet Mobbing attorneys flat out lied about a .me domain name and countless others, and because they are Legal Commentary from the Legal Blogsphere, whatever they say is LAW, Facts, and well, ME, with truckloads of documented proof, I am just a BLOGGER, a Woman, and some online Yapper trying to Defame, Take Trademarks and Copyrights by Bitching about the Trademarks and Copyrights Attorney, Gatekeeper Thugs.

Sidenote: Copyright THIS.
Hey Jordan Rushie, Ronald D. Green and the Bitch you Rode in on: Fuck YOU, you Evil, Conniving, Manipulating, Cruel, Life Endangering, Life Ruining, Mother Fuckers.

Personally, I know that I won't Win, District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL I lost in the first month. They already wiped out massive content, stole domain names, changed and redirected servers, threatened me, harassed me, caused ireparrable harm and all without First Amendment Adjudication of any kind. They even want massive amounts of money in attorney fees and $100,000 for each domain name that existed without there permission, even from Defendant Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology who never posted a word on any of them.

The Plaintiff once negotiated as my attorney on these same issues, yet Malpractice seems to be IGNORED. They are ALL above the Law, and you have NO RIGHTS, Period.

If any documents are gone from this post and you want a copy, please eMail me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com OR ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com or at Crystal@CrystalCox.com - the LEGAL Blogsphere Gate Keepers, get my blogs removed ALL the TIME, so who knows that will be here or there when you find this blog post.

Crystal L. Cox

Pro Se Defendant

Pro Se Counter Plaintiff

Altruistic Investigative Blogger

Mulvihill and Rushie LLC, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog INTERNET Mobbing, Organized Crime, Alleged Criminal and Civil Conspiracy / RICO Alleged by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. This Internet Mobbing Gang, with alleged members such as Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, they take one email out of many, they take a facebook post, a judges words out of context or old archived comments and posts they intentionally, maliciously paint a picture in the "legal blogsphere" to RUIN the lives of their targets and get their INTENDED RESULTS. They do this to win court cases, and to wipe out competition, oh and to Remove internet sites Exposing THEM. In my Opinion, and according to my Research and Personal Experience, They are GUILTY of Defamation, Harassment, Criminal Endangerment, Intentional Infliction, RICO Crimes and More. Yet they are a gang of attorneys and they have BIG Media Backing, and huge money such as Jordan Rushie Client Liberty Media Holdings. And therefore They are Above the LAW and will NOT be Found Guilty. YOU LOSE !!

Sunday, February 3, 2013

I am Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox Looking for Information on all Named Defendants in Supreme Court of the State of New York; County of New York, Case Number 105573-2011 (Rakofsky v. The Internet) AND all Counter Defendants in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

My Name is Crystal L. Cox, I am an Investigative Blogger looking for information on The Turkewitz Law Firm, New York Personal Injury Law Blog, Eric Turkewitz, Jordan Rushie and the Philly Law Blog, J. Malcom DeVoy and the Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group, Mark Bennett of Bennett and Bennett Law Firm and the blog blog.BennettandBennett.com, Scott H. Greenfield of blog.SimpleJustice.us,, Breaking Media LLC (AbovetheLaw.com ), Proskauer Rose Law Firm and all Named Defendants in Supreme Court of the State of New York; County of New York, Case Number 105573-2011 (Rakofsky v. The Internet) AND all Counter Defendants in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

RICO Legal Action and Indictments hinge on Pattern and History, so we need to prove that these same People, Reporters, Lawyers, Law Firms, NPR Hosts, Forbes Journalists, New York Times Journalists, Bloggers and more, do the same types of actions to their victims repeatedly. We need to prove who makes the money, who is connected and protected and who all the players are.

Please eMail your tips to Crystal@CrystalCox.com or ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com or SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

For More District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL AND Supreme Court of the State of New York; County of New York, Case Number 105573-2011 ( Rakofsky v. The Internet), Check out the Links Below

http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.com/

http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.com/2013/01/pro-se-counter-plaintiff-crystal-l-cox.html

http://www.josephrakofsky.com/2013/02/open-letter-to-joseph-rakofsky-from.html

http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/rakofsky-v-internet#description

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Open Letter to Joseph Rakofsky from Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, Regarding Rakofsky v. The Internet, Racketeering Claims, RICO, Pattern and History ALLEGED and Gang Stalking Attorneys Ruining Lives of their "Prey".

To: Joseph Rakofsky
Joseph Rakofsky, Rakofsky Law Firm P.C.

From: Pro Se Defendant, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox

Regarding: Information of Pattern and History among, what Looks to be Common Co-Conspirators, Bloggers, Attorneys, Media Outlets in the Case, Rakofsky v. The Internet of Joseph Rakofsky and the Crystal L. Cox Cases of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and District of Oregon CIVIL CASE 3:11-cv-00057-HZ,

Joseph Rakofsky,

My Name is Crystal L. Cox, I am an Investigative Blogger.

I, Crystal L. Cox, write this ENTIRE letter, Notice, upon my own personal knowledge and belief. I encourage all who read this information to look for documented facts and to do an independent investigation, examination of those facts.

I have over 1000 blogs and I have dedicated my life to exposing corruption. I have been in legal matters the last couple of years in which I believe, combined with your case will show Pattern and History and will effectively prosecute those guilty of RICO Crimes.

There are defendants, plaintiffs, attorneys, law firms, media, bloggers and other common elements or our cases in which I believe proves pattern and history of the same lawyers, media, law firms and bloggers.

I, Crystal L. Cox, had been reporting on / researching / interviewing / blogging on a $40 Million Oregon Bankruptcy for 3 years, when the attorneys who made millions in the bankruptcy, and the Bankruptcy Trustee, sued me, in order to silence my Internet Voice, Online Media exposing them. I fought back, rejected approx. 5 settlement offers. They offered me to go silent, and to blame others for bad information they claimed I was posting, however, I was posting the facts with my opinion of those facts to the best of my ability. And therefore I refused.

Obsidian V. Cox, was a Civil Trial for Defamation, regarding an Investigative Blogger, me, Crystal L. Cox and an Oregon Financial Advising Company, Obsidian Finance Group. It was in no way a criminal trial, nor was there a criminal investigation going on regarding me, in any way.

I lost this case, though I brought massive documents of the proof of my source of that post.

The Judge said that Oregon Retraction Laws, Oregon Shield Laws, the First Amendment and whether I had actual malice or not, simply DID not apply to me / matter in my case, because I was a Blogger and Not a Journalist, in his opinion of what a Journalist is or Is not, and his interpretation of law. One of those reasons being, I was not protected by the same laws as journalists because I did not have the “standards” and “ethics” this judge felt made me entitled to those laws, in his opinion of what "standards" makes an alleged journalist protected, or not protected by law and the constitution.

I fully believe that the Judge in my cases was protecting Elite Law Firms, and other Judges in Portland Oregon. There are many details, documented facts, depositions, hearings and videos to all of this, if there is interest to anyone.

However, the point here is, that in a Motion Denying a New Trial, and after discussions I believe the Judge had with Opposing Counsel in Private, and with an Attorney that claimed to be negotiating in my best interest, (Randazza Legal Group), the Judge issued a Denial for a New Trial and in this Denial, suggested I was guilty for the crime of extortion.

Many “media” outlets, bloggers, attorney bloggers and what I call a group of gang stalking attorneys, posted online that I was Guilty of Extortion and that is why I was not a Journalist and protected by the same laws as Journalist or all Citizens for that matter. This, of course, makes no sense as a matter of law, as whether I am a criminal or not, has nothing to do with whether I am a Journalist or Not, and thereby protected by the same laws and constitutional rights as traditional journalists.

I was not given due process of law, I was not convicted of Extortion, however, just as in your case, the judges distorted opinion, grabbed on to by a group of defaming gang stalkers for their own agendas, which was to STOP my appeal for one and to try and make it so that bloggers do not have the same legal rights as journalists. Another reason was an act of revenge for firing the attorney who was acting as if he was negotiating in my case, he is the same attorney involved in your case. Another reason was to shut down my blogs, steal domain names and suppress the story of the biggest technology crime in the world, and the involvement of their own clients. This is the iViewit Technology Case ( http://www.iviewit.tv/ )

Just as in your case, they ran with an email, out of context and without facts that these bloggers, attorneys, media could easily have found, thereby they had intentional infliction and actual malice. They simply lynched me, defamed me, and NOT based in Factual Documentation.

"The judge also referred to email sent by Cox to the plaintiffs, offering services for reputation repair for $2,500 per month," as many media outlets say, and this was given as a Reason I am not protected by the First Amendment, Shield Laws, Retraction Laws and with total disregard to actual malice.

A Federal Judge ruling over a Civil Trial, insinuates the Defendant is guilty of a Crime in a Denial of a Motion for a New Civil Trial. And rogue attorney bloggers, big media, and more gang up to defame, distort, paint in false light, and publicly disgrace the Defendant, whom was not on trial for a Crime in the first place.

The Judge was Supposed to be lawfully RULING regarding One Blog Post of December 25th 2010. Instead he BASED his Denial for a New RULING on one eMail out of 5 eMails between Pro Se Defendant Crystal Cox, acting in her pro se capacity, and David S. Aman, Opposing Counsel, SENT on January 19th 2011, which was a month after the Blog Post I was on Trial for. And AFTER / in response to a Lawsuit filed by David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm on behalf of Obsidian Finance Group filed on January 14th 2011 against Crystal Cox. Also keep in mind this one of 5 emails was SENT after / in response to a cease and desist, threat of a Lawsuit sent on December 22nd 2011, as the records show, it was a REPLY to this eMail as the Records show. And in Response to a 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit filed against me, Crystal Cox, as a way to offer a Settlement, a Negotiation to try and stop a lawsuit, not to Extort Anyway, as I had been reporting on the Summit Bankruptcy for 3 years.

This email that Judge Marco Hernandez claimed as a reason I had no Journalistic Standards, and therefore the law and constitution does not apply to me, had nothing to do with the blog post I was on trial for. In Fact it had not even been sent when the Alleged Defamatory Posts were Posted.

When I posted the alleged Defamatory Post I had not yet sent that eMail that Judge Marco Hernandez claimed was a reason that the laws that apply to other “media” and “journalists” did not apply to me.

My Case, Obsidian V. Cox is on appeal. Meanwhile I was sued AGAIN, by the attorney above that I mention was negotiating on my alleged behalf. This is District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and this case brings up the very same issues as Rakofsky v. The Internet, whereby a judges defamatory comments are taken by media, bloggers, attorneys and distorted in order to meet their objectives, and to defame, paint in false light and publicly humiliate their target.

In my case in Nevada, the Judge actual calls the Plaintiffs Evidence, which is print outs of blogs such as the Philly Law Blog, she calls them "Legal Commentary" and used them as a reason to give the Plaintiff massive blogs, domain name and online content, BEFORE I had due process, or the First Amendment was adjudicated in the matter / the speech at issue.

This is very important to you and other possible victims of these tactics, as these same attorney bloggers such as Jordan Rushie, J. Malcom DeVoy, Eric Turkewitz, Mark Bennett, Scott H. Greenfield and more are involved in creating a false "Legal Commentary" record against me, just as they are you. This is very dangerous to the Public at Large, as these attorneys gang up on victims to affect each others cases and the financial outcome of those cases, to their own best interest and the best interest of their clients such as Liberty Media and others.

They are given seemingly, automatic "Credibility" over their alleged victims, as most are not attorneys, and the COURTS, seem to think the Attorney more "Credible". This is unethical, immoral and a violation of our rights.

This Pattern and History is an abuse of power, a fraud on the courts, an tactic that can lead to extortion of clients on both sides of their cases, and is dangerous to the public at large.

In my Case, it has led to criminal endangerment, death threats, threats of violence, economic ruin, public lynching, career ruined, home taken, and as in your case, Defamation; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Tortious Interference;

I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox claim / allege, upon my knowledge an belief that these same “Parties” engage in this “Pattern and History” and thereby are Guilty of RICO Crime, Racketeering.

My Cases, District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and District of Oregon CIVIL CASE 3:11-cv-00057-HZ have many of the same “Players”, Attorneys, Media Outlets involved in this same Behavior.

These blogs, media outlets, "legal commentary" blogs, quote the judges, yet also distort the facts and push the criminal suggestion into flat out accusations of Extortion, and with "Actual Malice", as the know I, Defendant Crystal Cox was in a Civil Trial over Defamation, and not a Criminal Trial, and that I was not under investigation nor even charged with extortion, yet they "Lynched" Me. Lied about me, and they had easy access to the facts of the case, to Pacer, to blogs with documents of evidence and they ignored all of this and simply attacked me, Crystal Cox, defamed me, purposely painted me in false light and engaged in criminal endangerment, Defamation; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Tortious Interference, just as in Rakofsky v. The Internet.

Here are a Few Common Elements, Law Firms, Lawyers certainly no where near all.

The Turkewitz Law Firm

The Turkewitz Law Firm, New York Personal Injury Law Blog, Eric Turkewitz, also lied about, defamed, intimidated, harassed, me, Pro Se Defendant / Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox. And Eric Turkewitz defamed me, painted me in false light, caused massive emotional stress, Intentional Infliction and Tortious Interference. Eric Turkewitz accused me of crimes in which I had no criminal trial or criminal investigation of, no due process what so ever.

Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm has pattern and history with Randazza Legal Group, Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog, Kenneth P. White of Popehat.com, AboveTheLaw.com, the Legal Satyricon Blog, and more.

Also Just as in your case, Jordan Rushie and the Philly Law Blog, J. Malcom DeVoy and the Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group, Mark Bennett of Bennett and Bennett Law Firm and the blog blog.BennettandBennett.com, Scott H. Greenfield of blog.SimpleJustice.us,, Breaking Media LLC (AbovetheLaw.com ), and more have defamed me, painted me in false light, caused massive emotional stress, Intentional Infliction and Tortious Interference. And they have accused me of crimes in which I had no criminal trial or criminal investigation of, no due process what so ever.

My Cases, District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and District of Oregon CIVIL CASE 3:11-cv-00057-HZ has Forbest Journalist Kashmir Hill, who is connected to and formerly of Above Law Blog, who was represented by the same Attorney Suing Me of Randazza Legal Group. Also the New York Times, Fox News, NPR and other Big Media Outlets

There is an alleged memo that was sent out to all “Media” to NOT associate with Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, as this would discredit them. However, I, Crystal Cox was simply giving voice to victims of corruption. I did not extort anyone, nor make an money from this, yet I was made out to be a criminal and therefor ALL media, radio, newspapers, bloggers were to distance from me and thereby further discredit me. Which directly protects corruption in the courts and protects the MONOPOLY that Traditional Media has on Free Speech in the Courts.

Also involved in my media distortion, painting in false light were / are Thomas Reuters, NPR Bob Garfield, David Carr of the New York Times, Tracy L. Coenen of the Fraud Files Sequenceinc.com, and more alleged co-conspirators.

Many of our Common, Alleged Co-Conspirators have a Powerful Backing of Clients such as Liberty Media Holdings, whom Randazza Legal Group, Greenberg Traurig and Jordan Rushie of Mulvhill & Rushie LLC are attorneys for in Copyright Troll, Trademark and other Cases.

AboveTheLaw.com, NewyorkPersonalInjuryAttorneyBlog.com, SiouxsieLaw.com and others that blog about, defame, us both, have been previously represented in matters by Randazza Legal Group - the Legal Satyricon Blog and Attorney Jordan Rushie of the Philly Law Blog. They have massive conflicts of interest. And act in a repeating, (RICO), manner to shake down clients on both sides of legal cases they blog about, in my belief and knowledge.

Also connected is the Free Speech Coalition, and those who gang stalk in protection of the Free Speech Coalition and its agenda of protecting the Porn Industry Billionaires.

They are Aided and Abetted by Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Foley and Lardner, Brown White & Newhouse Law Firm, Greenberg Traurig and Randazza Legal Group Law Firm, upon my knowledge and belief.

Upon knowledge and belief; A bit about Proskauer Rose, who seems to be representing at least one of the parties in your case, Rakofsky v. The Internet. Proskauer Rose Lawyers were the original conspirators in the stealing of the iViewit Technology. Proskauer Rose Lawyer Kenneth Rubenstein was the main Lawyer in the beginning, over a decade ago. Kenneth Rubenstein is connected to Peter L. Michaelson, whom was recently used as a WIPO Panelist to Steal Domain names from me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and from Eliot Bernstein who is one of the iViewit Technology Inventors and the founder of the iViewit company. Both Cases District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and District of Oregon CIVIL CASE 3:11-cv-00057-HZ, name Eliot Bernstein as a Defendant. I was simply a reporter / an investigative blogger reporting on his story for over 4 years.

Godaddy Inc., WIPO, Francis Gurry WIPO Director, and Peter L. Michaelson New Jersey Attorney, are believed to be in conspiracy with Randazza Legal Group to silence the iViewit Technology Story and to defame, publicly humiliate, harass and intimidate me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.

I have Alleged Racketeering, and Filed a RICO Complaint in connection to District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL. I belief, upon my own personal experience and knowledge that there is a pattern and history among these same lawyers, bloggers, law firms and more in this same pattern to defame, disgrace, paint in false light, and ruin their target. I believe they do this in an organized manner in which appears to be "Legal Commentary" to unsuspecting judges and the public at large. However, it is clearly, in my opinion, a network of attorneys, media, bloggers that are conspiring to make their intended target "look" how they want them to, in order to WIN their legal cases or to set precedence for future cases.

Based upon my research, knowledge and personal experience, I believe this organized gang stalking, defamation racket is also to "shakedown" clients on ALL sides of a legal case, reach settlements quicker and get these attorneys the most amount of money the fastest. (Righthaven, seems to be one such instance. And in connection with J. Todd Kincannon, pretending to be on opposites sites but really friends, cohorts, as far as I interpret the research I have ton and tips I have been given)

For any details, case documents, or for me to join you in class action lawsuits, please eMail me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, at Crystal@CrystalCox.com or SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Sincerely,

Crystal L. Cox